Human Rights Committee
-
Adimayo M. Aduayom T. Diasso and Yawo S. Dobou V. Togo, Communication No. 424/1990, Views of 12 July 1996
-
Aemei v. Switzerland, Communication No. 34/1995, Views of 9 May 1997
-
Ahani v. Canada, Communication No. 1051/2002, Views of 29 March 2004
-
Alan v. Switzerland, Communication No.21/1995, Views of 8 May 1996
-
Almeida de Quinteros and Quinteros Almeida v. Uruguay, Communication 107/1981, Views of 21 July 1983
-
Almirati Nieto v. Uruguay, Communication No. 92/1981, Views of 25 July 1983
-
Althammer et al. v. Austria, Communication No. 998/2001, Views of 8 August 2003
-
Alzery v Sweden, Communication No. 1416/2005, Views of 25 October 2006
-
Apirana Mahuika et al. v. New Zealand, Communication No. 547/1993, Views of 27 October 2000
-
Ato del Avellanal v. Peru, Communication No. 202/1986, Views of 28 October 1988
-
Aumeeruddy-Cziffra and 19 other Mauritian women v. Mauritiu, Communication No. 035/1978, Views of 9 April 1981
-
Aurel Blaga v. Romania, Communication No. 1158/2003, Views of 30 March 2006
-
Aärelä and Näkkäläjärui v. Finland, Communication No. 779/1997, Views of 24 October 2001
-
Balaguer Santacana v. Spain, Communication No. 417/1990, Views of 15 July 1994
-
Ballantyne et al. v. Canada, Communication Nos. 359/1989, 385/1989, Views of 31 March 1993
-
Bautista de Arellana v. Colombia, Communication No. 563/1993, Views of 27 October 1995
-
Bhinder v. Canada, Communication No. 208/1986, Views of 9 November 1989
-
Blazek et al. v. The Czech Republic, Communication No. 857/1999, Views of 12 July 2001
-
Bleier v. Uruguay, Communication No. 030/1978, Views of 29 March 1982
-
Blom v. Sweden, Communication No. 191/1985, Views of 4 April 1988
-
Boodoo v. Trinidad and Tobago, Communication No. 721/1996, Views of 2 April 2002
-
Bordes and Temeharo v. France, Communication No. 645/1995, Decision on Admissibility of 22 July 1996
-
Brinkhof v. The Netherlands, Communication No. 402/1990, Views of 27 July 1993
-
Broeks v. The Netherlands, Communication No. 001/1984, Views of 9 April 1987
-
Brough v Australia, Communication No. 1184/2003, Views of 27 March 1981
-
Buffo Carballal v. Uruguay, Communication No. 33/1978, Views of 27 March 1981
-
Burrell v. Jamaica, Communication No. 546/1993, Views of 18 July 1996
-
Bwalya v. Zambia, Communication No. 314/1988, Views of 14 July 1993
-
C. v. Australia, Communication No. 900/1999, Views of 28 October 2002
-
Campbell (John) v. Jamaica, Communication No. 307/1988, Views of 24 March 1993
-
Canepa v. Canada, Communication No. 558/1993, Views of 3 April 1997
-
Casafranca de Gomez v. Peru, Communication No. 981/2001, Views of 22 July 2003
-
Cavalcanti Araujo-Jongen v. The Netherlands, Communication No. 418/1990, Views of 22 October 1993
-
Celepli v. Sweden, Communication No. 456/1991, Views of 18 July 1994
-
Celis Laureano v. Peru, Communication No 540/1993, Views of 25 March 1996
-
Chan v. Guyana, Communication No. 913/2000, Views of 31 October 2005
-
Coeriel and Aurik v. The Netherlands, Communication No. 453/1991, Views of 31 October 1994
-
Collins v. Jamaica, Communication No. 356/1989, Views of 25 March 1993
-
Correia de Matos v. Portugal, Communication No. 1123/2002, Views of 28 March 2006
-
Cox v. Canada, Communication No. 539/1993, Views of 31 October 1994
-
Delgado Páez v. Colombia, Communication No. 195/1985, Views of 12 July 1990
-
Derksen v. The Netherlands, Communication No. 976/2001, Views of 1 April 2004
-
Dermit Barbato v. Uruguay, Communication No. 84/1981, Views of 21 October 1982
-
Des Fours Walderode and Kammerlander v. The Czech Republic, Communication No. 147/1997, Views of 30 October 2001
-
Diergaardt et al. v. Namibia, Communication No 760/1997, Views of 25 July 2000
-
Drescher Caldas v. Uruguay, Communication No. 43/1979, Views of 21 July 1983
-
Dudko v. Australia, Communication No. 1347/2005, Views of 23 July 2007
-
Dzemajl et al. v. Yugoslavia, Communication No. 161/2000, Views of 21 November 2002
-
E. And A.K. v. Hungary, Communication No. 520/1992, Views of 07 April 1994
-
E. H. P. et al. v. Canada, Communication No. 67/1980, decision on admissibility of 27 October 1982
-
Elmi v. Australia, Communication No. 120/1998, Views of 14 May 1999
-
Estrella v. Uruguay, Communication No. 074/1980, Views of 29 March 1983
-
Fábryová v. Czech Republic, Communication No.765/1997, view of 30 October 2001
-
Fals Borda et al. v. Colombia, Communication No. 046/1979, Views of 27 July 1982
-
Faurisson v. France, Communication No. 550/1993, Views of 8 November 1996
-
Fei v. Colombia, Communication No. 514/1992, Views 4 April 1995
-
Francis (Clement) v. Jamaica, Communication No. 606/1994, Views of 25 July 1995
-
Francis (Victor) v. Jamaica, Communication No. 320/1988, Views of 24 March 1993
-
G.T. v. Australia, Communication No. 706/1996, Views of 4 November 1997
-
Garcia Pons v. Spain, Communication No. 454/1991, Views of 30 October 1995
-
Gauthier v. Canada, Communication No. 633/1995, Views of 7 April 1999
-
Gillot et al. v. France, Communication No. 932/2000, Views of 15 July 2002
-
Gorji-Dinka v. Cameroon, Communication No. 1134/2002, Views of 17 March 2005
-
Gueye et al. v. France, Communication No. 196/1983, Views of 3 April 1989
-
Guido Jacobs v. Belgium, Communication No. 943/2000, Views of 7 July 2004
-
Hamilton v. Jamaica, Communication No. 333/1988, Views of 7 July 1994
-
Hendricks v. Guyana, Communication No. 838/1998, Views of 28 October 2002
-
Hendriks v. The Netherlands, Communication No. 201/1985, Views of 27 July 1988
-
Herrera Rubio et al. v. Colombia, Communication No. 161/1983, Views of 2 November 1987
-
Hertzberg et al. v. Finland, Communication No.61/79, Views of 2 April 1982
-
Hopu and Bessert v. France, Communication No. 549/1993, Views of 29 July 1997
-
Hudoyberganova v. Uzbekistan, Communication No. 931/2000, Views of 5 November 2004
-
J.B. et al. v. Canada, Communication No. 118/1982, Views of 18 July 1986
-
J.R.T. and the W.G. party v. Canada, Communication No. 104/1981, decision on admissibility of 6 April 1983
-
Jalloh v. The Netherlands, Communication No. 794/1998, Views of 26 March 2002
-
Johnson (Clive) v. Jamaica, Communication No. 592/1994, Views of 20 October 1998
-
Johnson (Errol) v. Jamaica, Communication No. 588/1994, Views of 22 March 1996
-
Joslin et al. v. New Zealand, Communication No. 902/1999, Views adopted 17 July 2002
-
Judge v. Canada, Communication No. 829/1998, Views of 5 August 2003
-
Kalenga v. Zambia, Communication No 326/1988, Views of 27 July 1993
-
Karakurt v. Austria, Communication No. 965/2000, Views of 4 April 2002
-
Kavanagh v. Ireland, Communication No. 819/1998, Views of 4 April 2001
-
Kelly v. Jamaica, Communication No. 253/1987, Views of 8 April 1991
-
Kennedy v. Trinidad and Tobago, Communication No. 845/1998, Views 26 March 2002
-
Khan v. Canada, Communication No. 15/1994, Views of 15 November 1994
-
Kim v. Republic of Korea, Communication No. 574/1994, Views of 3 November 1998
-
Kindler v. Canada, Communication No. 470/1990, Views of 30 July 1993
-
Kisoki v. Sweden, Communication No. 41/1996, Views of 8 May 1996
-
KL v. Peru, Communication No. 1153/2003, Views of 22 November 2005
-
Lansman (Ilmari) et al. v. Finland, Communication No. 511/1992, 26 October 1994
-
Lansman (Jouni E.) et al. v. Finland, Communication No. 671/1995, Views of 30 October 1996
-
Lantsova v. The Russian Federation, Communication No. 763/1997, Views of 26 March 2002
-
Laptsevich v. Belarus, Communication No. 780/1997, Views of 20 March 2000
-
Larranaga v. The Philippines, Communication No. 1421/2005, Views of 24 July 2006
-
LaVende v. Trinidad and Tobago, Communication No. 554/1993, Views of 29 October 1997
-
Leirvag v. Norway, Communication No. 1155/2003, Views of 3 November 2004
-
Leslie v. Jamaica, Communication No 564/1993, Views of 31 July 1998
-
Levy v. Jamaica, Communication No. 719/1996, Views of 3 November 1998
-
Lewis v. Jamaica, Communication No. 527/1993, Views of 18 July 1996
-
Lopez Burgos v. Uruguay, Communication No. 052/1979, Views of 29 July 1981
-
Love et al. v. Australia, Communication No. 983/2001, Views of 25 March 2003
-
Lovelace v. Canada, Communication No. 24/1977, Views of 30 July 1981
-
Lubuto v. Zambia, Communication No. 390/1990, Views of 31 October 1995
-
M.A. v. Italy, Communication No. 117/1981, Views of 10 April 1984
-
Mahuika et al. v. New Zealand, Communication No. 547/1993, Views of 27 October 2000
-
Manera Lluberas v. Uruguay, Communication No. 123/1982, Views of 6 April 1984
-
Marshall v. Canada, Communication No. 205/1986, Views of 30 January 1986
-
Matthews v. Trinidad and Tobago, Communication No. 569/1993, Views of 31 March 1998
-
Mátyus v. Slovakia, Communication No. 923/2000, Views of 22 July 2002
-
Mbenge v. Zaire, Communication No 16/1977, Views of 25 March 1983
-
McLawrence v. Jamaica, Communication No. 702/1996, Views of 18 July 1997
-
Mojica v. Dominican Republic, Communication No. 449/1991, Views of 15 July 1994
-
Monaco de Gallicchio and Vicario v. Argentina, Communication No. 400/1990, Views of 3 April 1995
-
Mpaka-Nsusu v. Zaire, Communication No. 157/1983, Views of 26 March 1986
-
Mukong v. Cameroon, Communication No. 458/1991, Views of 21 July 1994
-
Muñoz Hermoza v. Peru, Communication No. 203/1986, Views of 4 November 1988
-
Mutombo v. Switzerland, Communication No. 13/1993, Views of 27 April 1994
-
Müller and Engelhard v. Namibia, Communication No. 919/2000, Views of 26 March 2002
-
Nahlik et al. v. Austria, Communication No. 608/1995, decision on admissibility of 22 July 1996
-
Ng v. Canada, Communication 469/1991, Views of 5 November 1993
-
Oló Bahamonde v. Equatorial Guinea, Communication No. 468/1991, Views of 20 October 1993
-
Ominayak (Lubicon Lake Band) v. Canada, Communication No. 167/1984, Views of 26 March
-
Orihuela Valenzuela v. Peru, Communication No. 309/1988, Views of 14 July 1993
-
Osbourne v. Jamaica, Communication No. 759/1997, Views of 15 March 2000
-
Park v. Republic of South Korea, Communication No. 628/1995, Views of 20 October 1998
-
Pauger v. Austria, Communication No. 716/1996, Views of 25 March 1999
-
Peltonen v. Finland, Communication No. 492/1992, Views of 21 July 1994
-
Polay Campos v. Peru, Communication No. 577/1994, Views of 6 November 1997
-
Prince v. South Africa, Communication No. 1474/2006, Views of 31 October 2007
-
Rajan v. New Zealand, Communication No. 820/1998, Admissibility Decision of 6 August 2003
-
Rajapakse v. Sri Lanka, Communication No. 1250/2004, Views of 14 July 2006
-
Riley et al. v. Canada, Communication No. 1048/2002, Admissibility Decision of 21 March 2002
-
Robinson v. Jamaica, Communication No. 223/1987, Views 30 March 1989
-
Rodriguez v. Uruguay, Communication No. 322/1988, Views of 19 July 1994
-
Ross v. Canada, Communication No. 736/1997, Views of 18 October 2000
-
Sanjuan Arévalo v. Colombia, Communication No. 181/1984, Views of 3 November 1989
-
Sanlés Sanlés v. Spain, Communication No. 1024/2001, Decision on Admissibility of 30 March 2004
-
Santacana v. Spain, Communication No. 417/1990, Views of 15 July 1994
-
Schmitz - de - Jong v. The Netherlands, Communication No. 855/1999, Views of 16 July 2001
-
Semey v. Spain, Communication No. 986/2001, Views of 30 July 2003
-
Sextus v. Trinidad and Tobago, Communication No. 818/1998, Views of 16 July 2001
-
Shafiq v. Australia, Communication No. 1324/2004, Views of 31 October 2006
-
Simunek et al. v. the Czech Republic, Communication No.516/1992, Views of 19 July 1995
-
Singh Bhinder v. Canada, Communication No. 208/1986, Views of 9 November 1989
-
Sohn v. Republic of South Korea, Communication 518/1992, Views of 19 July 1995
-
Solis v. Peru, Communication No. 1016/2001, Views of 27 March 2006
-
Solorzano v. Venezuela, Communication No. 156/1983, Views of 26 March 1986
-
Somers v. Hungary, Communication No. 566/1993, Views of 23 July 1996
-
Sprenger v. The Netherlands, Communication No. 395/1990, Views of 31 March 1992
-
Stewart v. Canada, Communication No. 538/1993, Views of 1 November 1996
-
Suarez de Guerrero v. Colombia, Communication No. R.11/45, Views of 31 March 1982
-
Taylor (Patrick) v. Jamaica, Communication No. 707/1996, Views of 18 July 1997
-
Terrón v. Spain, Communication No. 1073/2002, Views of 5 November 2004
-
Thomas (Damian) v. Jamaica, Communication No 800/1998, Views of 26 May 1999
-
Thomas (Maurice) v. Jamaica, Communication No. 321/1988, Views of 19 October 1993
-
Thompson v. St Vincent and the Grenadines, Communication No. 806/1998, Views of 18 October 2000
-
Toala et al. v. New Zealand, Communication No. 675/1995, Views of 2 November 2000
-
Toonen v. Australia, Communication No. 488/1992, Views of 31 March 1994
-
Torres v. Finland, Communication No. 291/1988, Views of 2 April 1990
-
Vaihere Bordes and Temeharo v. France, Communication No. 645/1995, Admissability decision of 22 July 1996
-
Varela Nuñez v. Uruguay, Communication No. 108/1981, Views of 22 July 1983
-
Vasilskis v. Uruguay, Communication No. 80/1980, Views of 31 March 1983
-
Veriter v. France, Communication No. 1088/2002, Admissibility Decision of 6 August 2003
-
Viana Acosta v. Uruguay, Communication No.110/1981, Views of 29 March 1984
-
Vos (A.P. Johannes) v. The Netherlands, Communication No. 786/1997, Views of 26 July 1999
-
Vuolanne v. Finland, Communication No. 265/1987, Views of 7 April 1989
-
Waldman v. Canada, Communication No. 694/1996, Views of 3 November 1999
-
Winata and Li v. Australia, Communication No. 930/2000, Views of 26 July 2001
-
X v. Colombia, Communication 1361/2005, Views of 30 March 2007
-
Yilmaz-Dogan v. The Netherlands, Communication No. 1/1984, Views of 10 August 1988
-
Young v. Australia, Communication No. 941/2000, Views of 6 August 2003
-
Young v. Jamaica, Communication No. 615/1995, Views of 4 November 1997
-
Zelaya Blanco v. Nicaragua, Communication No. 328/1988, Views of 20 July 1994
-
Zwaan-de Vries v. The Netherlands, Communication No. 182/1984, Views of 9 April 1987
